I then spent the day, on and off, in a discussion with some people who didn't think it was very good. I've been struggling to understand their position ever since. You will see from the correspondence, which I am going to have a go at transcribing below, that at one point I got a bit frustrated and gave a silly answer to a silly question.
If you want to follow it you really have no choice but to read the Broadbent post first. It is here and point eight is the key one with the twenty ideas listed. If anyone wants any of the initialisms explained please leave a comment. BMO is Bishop's Mission Order.
'Twenty quick hits to change the #CofE' by Bp of Willesden, Pete Broadbent @petespurs. #strategic
http://bishopofwillesden.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/twenty-quick-hits-to-change-cofe.html …
http://bishopofwillesden.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/twenty-quick-hits-to-change-cofe.html …
12.12
12.15
12.27
12.51
1.34
3.06
3.08
.@s1eve The clergy role is simply not one to which the word "performance" applies in any sensible way @petespurs
3.08
3.11
3.11
(I think this means 'Which bishop is in a position to review? - ed)
3.12
3.13
3.15
3.16
4.12
(Ontological meaning it is more about being than doing, the opposite of which would be a functional view - ed)
4.17
4.20
4.24
4.30
4.34
6.00
6.01
6.06
6.14
7.26
7.32
(Her bio on Twitter says:)
Virtual vicar. Ex prison chaplain, teacher, health service. Into politics, TV, socmedia. Will follow back, but don't auto follow. I unfollow trolls.
7.54
8.00
8.12
8.13
8.21
It's hard to follow Twitter streams without a hashtag. Later I will the (sic) to transcribe yesterday's conversation and post it to blog for you.
8.40
9.03
9.10
9.12
3 comments:
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Who evaluates the evaluators?
The flaw in the evaluation model is that the bishops aren't up to it.
Fourth generation or Realist evaluation methods, wouldn't leave it to bishops or any hierarchy figures, but groups accountable to each other, evaluating not just the people but the ideas behind actions. Not sure that I would count things st... but I would want to have evaluative conversations to explore where we go next...
So if you were charged with growing a church numerically and it shrunk would that not be part of the evaluative evidence?
Post a Comment