Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Thursday, January 05, 2017

2016 Review of the Year

So here we go with a look back at 2016. And it will involve a bit of  'Apart from that Mrs Lincoln what did you think of the play?' Elephants in the room, even if they stand quietly, tend to leave dents in the floorboards.

Album of the year? Well I remain of the view that in a year when Radiohead put out a new album everyone else should fight over second place. This is indeed the case. A Moon Shaped Pool is an astounding, magical, soulful, dramatic, creative and haunting piece of work. Best of the rest was Steve Mason's Meet the Humans.

Film of the year. Didn't spend as much time at the cinema as I would have liked which meant that much watching was last year's. Rogue One was excellent fun. Jack Reacher ignored the advice of the title Never Go Back and went back. People got hurt. I really enjoyed The Accountant though. I like maths, dialogue, thrills and espionage. All boxes ticked.

As previously noted I also have trouble reading books in the year of publication. So nothing from me about works that were actually published in 2016. My two favourite books of the year were as pictured.

Paul Mason was the only person I read who wrote a realistic guide to why Brexit might be a good idea - he then advised against it because the timing was wrong. In Post-Capitalism, he asserts that the era of the technological revolution has gone on too long and soon not everyone will need to work. But we will need to contribute and the world needs to work out how to pay us. I reviewed it here.

Everything Magnus Mills writes leaves me convinced I am being taken by the hand and led slowly somewhere very profound. At the end I wonder if I have read something deep, imaginative or a simple children's story. Any piece of writing that lets the reader decide what it was all about without comment - you read or hear few interviews with Mills - is a job well done. Reviewed here.

Eating out? It was the year we discovered Maitreya Social in Easton. As a seasonal, organic, local-produce, vegetarian restaurant in an ethnically diverse part of Bristol you might want to beware of catching right-onness. But the tastes are amazing. And if you don't contract a hipster beard there you certainly will do at WB at Wapping Wharf. Fish, chips and craft ale. I might have been its greatest fan/evangelist this year. By Saturday I will have taken almost everyone I like, who has visited the south-west with a mealtime to spare, there. (Takes quick break to issue another invitation.) Their Smokin' Barrels was my beer of the year.

Some honourable mentions. @porrdidgebrain entertained me on Twitter on a daily basis (sometimes hourly). Eddie Mair on Radio Four's PM made broadcasting seem an absolute breeze. As Did Danny Baker, both on Radio Five of a Saturday morning and as @prodnose on Twitter. Nacer Chadli restored my belief that there are players who will make a lung-busting run for the cause of West Brom (See his second goal in the 4-2 defeat of West Ham.)

See you at the end of 2017.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

A Twitter Discussion

Yesterday morning Bishop Pete Broadbent posted a Twitter link to a blog post he had written which included a paragraph - twenty quick fixes the Church of England could do now. I read it and thought it was rather good. I re-tweeted it.

I then spent the day, on and off, in a discussion with some people who didn't think it was very good. I've been struggling to understand their position ever since. You will see from the correspondence, which I am going to have a go at transcribing below, that at one point I got a bit frustrated and gave a silly answer to a silly question.

If you want to follow it you really have no choice but to read the Broadbent post first. It is here and point eight is the key one with the twenty ideas listed. If anyone wants any of the initialisms explained please leave a comment. BMO is Bishop's Mission Order.



 
12.12
Really? I didn't feel bashed by it. What hurt?
 
12.15
Comments more than article, but handed out the ammo with remark on "under performing" clergy needing to be got rid of.
 
12.27
you want to keep the under-performers?
 
12.51
you point them out to me and then let's discuss it...
 
1.34
I am not in a position to review clergy performance. But a bishop is.
 
3.06
I don't think a Bishop has any more idea of what "performance" means for clergy than I do, except by the crudest measures
 
3.08
. The clergy role is simply not one to which the word "performance" applies in any sensible way
 
3.08
Oh I expect there'll be lots of 'performance markers' like running Alpha courses and Messy Churches
 
3.11
See, I'm underperforming already!
 
3.11
 
(I think this means 'Which bishop is in a position to review? - ed)
 
3.12
 
3.13
How about celebrating the Eucharist, baptizing people, and preaching sermons?
 
3.15
Yes, but *good* sermons or poor ones? We are judging *performance* here, not just activity...


3.16
Maybe we could bring Ofsted in

4.12
I think knickers are being twisted here. If you take an ontological view of priesthood OK. I don't.
 
(Ontological meaning it is more about being than doing, the opposite of which would be a functional view - ed)
 
4.17
I take a very *un*-ontological view! Still don't think clergy performance can be measured meaningfully.

4.20
Yes, you can measure *activity* but anything beyond that is either subjective or spurious
 
4.24
hope it isn't me making you angry, but ontological view cannot easily be counted. Functional can.
 
4.30
No, not you! What measures of clergy performance would you use & how assess contribution of congregation(s)?
 
4.34
anything that can be counted. It's all we got. 360 performance review and detailed report & discussion.
 
Measuring performance indicators ALWAYS makes people skew workload towards what's being measured
 
6.00
So in this model an 'activist' concept of ministry takes precedent over any other form of priesthood
 
6.01
That may work if you can afford to pay for absolutely all ministry, if you can't, it's cloud cuckoo land
 
6.06
you measure as much as possible. Maybe 'more people seeking opportunities for quiet and sacred space.'
 
6.14
Measurements like that are fairly easy to game (sic) - saw it in prison chaplaincy where regime hours are measured
 
7.26
Pam is there any sense in which you feel people should be held to account? Professionals or volunteers?
 
7.32
Look at my bio. What do you think?
 
(Her bio on Twitter says:)
 
Virtual vicar. Ex prison chaplain, teacher, health service. Into politics, TV, socmedia. Will follow back, but don't auto follow. I unfollow trolls.
 
 
7.54
  You have had to cope with a lot of review in your life and have been wounded by it?
 
8.00
Do you normally assume people who disagree with you are either ignorant or psychologically unstable?
 
8.12
 
8.13
That's what I thought, just checking
 
8.21
It's hard to follow Twitter streams without a hashtag. Later I will the (sic) to transcribe yesterday's conversation and post it to blog for you.

8.40
but reading back through today I haven't disagreed with anyone, just asked questions.
 
9.03
I'm going to wade in. There are more ways to evaluate than counting the quantifiable.
 
9.10
we've known the value of qualitative, narrative evaluation for long time in youthwork.

9.12
appraisls and reviews drew heavily on case study, story, 'distance traveled', not just counting.